{"id":191,"date":"2019-03-13T14:31:57","date_gmt":"2019-03-13T19:31:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.slabdata.com\/blog\/?p=191"},"modified":"2019-03-13T14:39:29","modified_gmt":"2019-03-13T19:39:29","slug":"this-or-that","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.slabdata.com\/blog\/2019\/this-or-that\/","title":{"rendered":"Why is this slab more valuable than that one?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>This post is taken from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cgccomics.com\/boards\/topic\/448390-why-is-nyx-more-valuable-than\/\" target=\"cgcboard\">CGC Board<\/a>\u00a0where user &#8220;Hollywood1892&#8221; asked:  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>QUESTION: Why is NYX #3 More Valuable than New Mutants #87 and New Mutants #98? <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ANSWER:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;<strong>Supply<\/strong>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<strong>demand<\/strong>&nbsp;determine<strong>&nbsp;value<\/strong>&#8221; is easy to say, and it&#8217;s the right answer&nbsp;&#8230;but&#8230; I like putting actual numbers to those concepts.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SUPPLY (CGC 9.8 universal counts):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>New Mutants #87 = 1,454&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>New Mutants #98 = 2,759<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>NYX #3 = 1,505<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>VALUE (CGC 9.8 universal sales average):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>New Mutants #87 = $425<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>New Mutants #98 = $750<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>NYX #3 = $915<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>DEMAND (supply times value):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>New Mutants #87 = 1,454 x $425 = $617,950<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>New Mutants #98 = 2,759 x $750 = $2,069,250<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>NYX #3 = 1,505 x $915 = $1,377,075<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CONCLUSION: <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>NYX #3 is basically halfway between New Mutants #87 and New Mutants #98 in DEMAND (as defined above).&nbsp;&nbsp;The individual prices for each copy are less important, because the supplies are different.&nbsp; Put the two together (SUPPLY x VALUE) and you get something (DEMAND) that&#8217;s possible to compare across books.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There are plenty of objections to this simple calculation, such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What about the CGC 9.6, CGC 9.4, etc.?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What about all the additional raw copies that have never been sent to CGC?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What about the higher grades?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What about the fact that these books had different numbers of copies printed in the first place, regardless of how many are on the CGC Census?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What about more copies being sent to CGC all the time?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These objections are valid, but the original question reflected only one variable (Value) while the answer given here includes three variables (Value, Supply, Demand).  It&#8217;s always possible to add more variables to any equation, but we quickly realize that both <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pareto_principle\" target=\"pareto\">Pareto<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Occam%27s_razor\" target=\"occam\">Occam<\/a> are more famous than we are for good reason&#8230; <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>They didn&#8217;t spend all day asking &#8220;But what about these 14 other things?&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This post is taken from the CGC Board\u00a0where user &#8220;Hollywood1892&#8221; asked: QUESTION: Why is NYX #3 More Valuable than New Mutants #87 and New Mutants #98? ANSWER: &#8220;Supply&nbsp;and&nbsp;demand&nbsp;determine&nbsp;value&#8221; is easy to say, and it&#8217;s the right answer&nbsp;&#8230;but&#8230; I like putting actual numbers to those concepts.&nbsp; SUPPLY (CGC 9.8 universal counts): New Mutants #87 = 1,454&nbsp; &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.slabdata.com\/blog\/2019\/this-or-that\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Why is this slab more valuable than that one?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-191","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-case-study"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.slabdata.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.slabdata.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.slabdata.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.slabdata.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.slabdata.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=191"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"http:\/\/www.slabdata.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":198,"href":"http:\/\/www.slabdata.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191\/revisions\/198"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.slabdata.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=191"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.slabdata.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=191"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.slabdata.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=191"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}